TOPICS

The Hydrogen for Oil scam

The Hydrogen for Oil scam


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

By Miguel Angel Llana

Important sectors of politics and the economy are very interested in orienting the information properly to get the most out of issues as crucial as energy, even if for this they have to reach wars for oil, agrofuels from hunger, transgenics damaging the environment. ecosystem, regardless of whether all this derives and affects climate change.


Important sectors of politics and the economy are very interested in orienting the information properly to get the most out of issues as crucial as energy, even if for this they have to go to wars for oil, agrofuels from hunger, transgenics damaging the environment. ecosystem, regardless of whether all this derives and affects climate change. It is not surprising that the institutional and media montage creates confusion and all kinds of nonsense is said and written; There are too many interests at stake even at the cost of the survival of millions of people, as is happening intentionally, but without this being an obstacle or a problem for the great powers, powers only in weapons and destruction, they are proving to be nothing else.

The chain of errors in the article "The end of oil" [1] related to Physics, Chemistry and technology, seriously distorts the international energy situation by considering Hydrogen as an alternative source of energy when it confuses and compares it with natural gas, coal, solar energy, wind, among others ;, also mixing renewable and alternative energies with those that are neither one nor the other.

Hydrogen is not free in Nature [2]. There are no H2 deposits, it is not a source of energy, it is only a fuel that can be obtained with certain procedures in which it will always be necessary to provide more energy than what is going to be obtained, because as in any process, there will always be losses such as this is how the laws of thermodynamics determine it. They contain H2, among others, hydrocarbons, oils, alcohols and water, but always forming part of molecules that need to be dissociated, obtaining all their energy by burning them directly if they are combustible or, otherwise, providing energy that releases the H2 in the moment or later, for immediate or delayed use, acting in this case as a deposit or storage of energy.

As in any argument, the first step being false, the others are totally or partially false. The cited article talks about the greater energy efficiency of the H2 battery compared to internal combustion engines, forgetting that it compares a non-renewable energy source, such as gasoline or diesel, with H2 that is not even a source of energy. not to mention how and with what energy the battery is charged. It continues with the cost of the engines and the problem of their respective technologies to end the commercial structure of oil being valued at ten trillion dollars, an amount that does not exist in this world (a frequent mistake to translate billion by billion and not by billion) . Most of the information provided is misleading or even false.

In the aforementioned article, the author is committed to seeking new technologies to be able to continue with the current level of energy consumption and performance and maintaining the current price of oil and suggests: "that in the future the world energy matrix must necessarily be a mixture of starting with hydrogen, solar panels and wind towers. "

More confusion is no longer possible (apart from the fact that the lack of these technologies are being replaced by wars and military occupations) not only considers H2 as a source of energy but also proposes it as an energy source along with others that are a source of energy, renewable and alternatives, but forgetting that they are limited and that the future is necessarily in saving energy [3]. There is no use resorting to tics such as improving energy efficiency and citing Fidel Castro when all this is done in this context of nonsense.


Issues related to energy always cause the same mistakes and frequently end up in the same hole, where it is believed that anything is possible and that you can always continue winning, growing, competing, but, it turns out, that hole has no way out, Resources are limited, such as the surface area or the volume of the Earth. Surely, the culture and habitual speculative practice of multiplying goods free of charge through manipulations or directly with tremendous endless wars, but which have the common denominator of being the origin of misery and the death of millions of people because of and in the service of that neoliberal model in need of insatiable economic growth. But it happens, contrary to energy issues, that the accounts are not so easy: neither Chemistry, nor Physics and their common supervisor Thermodynamics, are for the task of substituting laws for outrages, for wars and gratuitous profits; they do not lend themselves to tricks because fortunately the laws of science are neither bought nor sold. In the middle of all this are the resources of nature that are numerous and each more important, but one, among all of them, which is energy, has no substitutes, it is not replaceable, it can be presented in multiple ways, but it cannot be interchanged. . We have fossil deposits, although many have already been depleted, and we have solar energy that, together with the tides caused by the Moon, constitute an inexhaustible source of energy, although limited, but since energy cannot be multiplied or speculated to obtain more, That is why they resort to expropriating, stealing, invading and occupying - militarily clear - which is what the democratic powers are doing over any country that smells of resources and even more if it smells of energy; they favor and favor misinformation because it is one more ally, but essential.


Notes:
[1] The end of oil, Juan Carlos Guerra, Rebellion, 09-09-2007
[2] Hydrogen and ‘continuous movement’, Miguel Ángel Llana, Rebelión, 02-05-2006
[3] From wasting energy to forced saving, Miguel Ángel Llana, Rebelión, 02-23-2007


Video: Stanley Meyer Hoax! Stanley Meyer Didnt Use HHO! (May 2022).